'The biggest environmental crime in history'

by liamssoft | January 16, 2008 at 09:13 am

677 views | 6 Recommendations | 5 comments

Alberta, Canada has one of the largest petroleum deposits in the world, estimated at between 1.5 to 2.7 Trillion barrels, but theres just one problem the oil is stuck in the sands and is very difficult and environmentally expensive to extract. The extraction processes produce huge amounts of greenhouse gases....

BP, the British oil giant that pledged to move "Beyond Petroleum" by finding cleaner ways to produce fossil fuels, is being accused of abandoning its "green sheen" by investing nearly £1.5bn to extract oil from the Canadian wilderness using methods which environmentalists say are part of the "biggest global warming crime" in history.

The multinational oil and gas producer, which last year made a profit of £11bn, is facing a head-on confrontation with the green lobby in the pristine forests of North America after Greenpeace pledged a direct action campaign against BP following its decision to reverse a long-standing policy and invest heavily in extracting so-called "oil sands" that lie beneath the Canadian province of Alberta and form the world's second-largest proven oil reserves after Saudi Arabia.

Producing crude oil from the tar sands – a heavy mixture of bitumen, water, sand and clay – found beneath more than 54,000 square miles of prime forest in northern Alberta – an area the size of England and Wales combined – generates up to four times more carbon dioxide, the principal global warming gas, than conventional drilling. The booming oil sands industry will produce 100 million tonnes of CO2 (equivalent to a fifth of the UK's entire annual emissions) a year by 2012, ensuring that Canada will miss its emission targets under the Kyoto treaty, according to environmentalist activists.

Greenpeace's energy solution is clearly outlined in their independently commissioned energy [r]evolution report.

recommend Add a comment
0
moonwolf

It simply shows that many will s**t in their own nest for a buck!

Thank goodness I don't live in Alberta.  Hey maybe they can build their reactors on the wasteland they are creating with the tar sands! 

moonwolf
moonwolf
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:49 on January 16th, 2008

Wake up and smell the bitumen!

Martha Jones
Martha Jones
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:02 on January 16th, 2008

This is alarming, liamssoft.

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:35 on January 16th, 2008

liamssoft, I didn't know the drilling/CO2 relation, with the stock market running out of cash


the project will probably not see 2012 but burried in sand


 

0
atomcat

 Build a big Wind Farm at the Tar Sands

Both the energy companies and the govt keep saying wind will provide us with clean energy. The reason they don't use wind turbines at the Tar Sands is because they aren't  reliable and they are expensive. They are however, good for producing carbon credits so companies like the ones working the Tar Sands can tell the public they have cut their emissions.

The govt. is lying and so are the energy companies and the press. All the while, the gulible public eat up the scam. 

According to the Premier of Ont., Dalton McGuinty

Ontario Hansard - 19-April2006

“I think the member
opposite knows that when it comes to natural gas, prices there tend to
be volatile, and it remains a significant contributor to global
warming. Wind turbines: We are investing heavily in those, but again,
those are an expensive form of electricity and they’re not reliable.

Having said that in 2006, an anouncment to build huge wind farms in the Great Lakes for at least twice the price of the ones on shore. Brilliant!

Ontario to approve Great Lakes wind power

All the environmentalists better take a hard look at this. Looks
like wind power is just to create carbon credits. Here comes big Hydro
Dams, Big Coal Plants and Nuclear. We need to join forces and take back
our electrical system.

T h e e 8 ‘ s r e c o mm e n d a t i o n s

 

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

January 16, 2008 at 09:13 am by liamssoft, 677 views, 5 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from