Clint Eastwood Strikes Back at Spike Lee's Claims

by Jarrett Martineau | June 6, 2008 at 06:50 pm | 998 views | 6 comments

Responding to Spike Lee's recent allegations that Clint Eastwood failed to include black actors in his 'Iwo Jima' films, Dirty Harry struck back by defending his decision and claiming that the films are historically accurate. I predict further Lee vs. Eastwood grumblings will fly.

UPDATE | June 6, 2008 — Clint Bites Back at Spike

Clint Eastwood has responded to fellow director Spike Lee's claims that there are too few black actors in his films, saying he should "shut his face".

Speaking to the Guardian newspaper, Eastwood said his 2006 film Flags of Our Fathers was historically accurate.

The Oscar winner insisted that black troops were not involved in raising the flag at Iwo Jima.

"If I go ahead and put an African American actor in there, they'd say 'this guy's lost his mind,'" he said.

At this year's Cannes Film Festival, film-maker Lee challenged reporters to ask Eastwood why there were no black actors in either of his films about the Battle of Iwo Jima. "That was his version. The Negro version did not exist," said Lee.

Eastwood said that there was a small detachment of black troops in the World War II battle, but they were part of a munitions company.

"The story is Flags of Our Fathers, the famous flag-raising picture, and they didn't do that," he told the Guardian. "It's not accurate."
Somewhat ironically, Eastwood's next picture will examine post-apartheid South Africa:
The Human Factor, will look at post-apartheid South Africa: "I'm not going to make Nelson Mandela a white guy," he joked.
PREVIOUSLY | May 21, 2008 — Spike Lee made a splash at Cannes this year, by lashing out at Clint Eastwood for failing to include - or depict - any black soldiers in his recent WWII films: Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima.

Although Lee's criticism is valid, he does have an alternate agenda: promoting his own WWII film, "Miracle at St. Anna", which focuses on an all-black American military division that fought in Italy.

SpikeLee is slamming Clint Eastwood over his two recent Iwo Jima movies,saying the filmmaker overlooked the role of black soldiers during WorldWar II.

Lee - whose next film is this fall's "Miracle at St. Anna,"the story of an all-black U.S. division fighting in Italy during thewar - said Eastwood's 2006 movies "Flags of Our Fathers" and "LettersFrom Iwo Jima" were whites-only affairs.

"He did two films aboutIwo Jima back to back and there was not one black soldier in both ofthose films," Lee said Tuesday at the Cannes Film Festival, where hewas a judge in an online short-film competition.

"Many veterans,African-Americans, who survived that war are upset at Clint Eastwood.In his vision of Iwo Jima, Negro soldiers did not exist. Simple asthat. I have a different version," Lee said.

But there's more to Lee's Cannes fest agenda than asserting his vision for filmic depictions of WWI race politics. The director is also in attendance to demonstrate his new media swagger and hand out cash and awards to winners of an online film festival hosted and produced by Babelgum.
Director Spike Lee was in Cannes to hand out awards of $31,360 each to seven emerging directors whose work was championed by Internet users in an online film festival hosted by Babelgum, an Internet company that streams videos online for free.

The awards ceremony late Tuesday was hosted on the sidelines of the famous French Riviera festival. About 2,000 short films were submitted, and 1,012 films from 86 countries were picked to compete. Hundreds of thousands of people watched the movies, posted comments or voted on their favorite picks.

Films that generated buzz online were whittled down by a jury, and Lee had the final say.

Lee believes there's more interesting, innovative material online than on TV or in movie theaters.

Love or hate him, Lee's done a great job of setting the fest abuzz with his news and views. Now where's the juicy gossip about his diva director's demands?

Add a comment Comments (6)

BigT

Good article.

BigT
good stuff:

Isn't this old news? Many people brought up the fact that there were
no black soldiers in Eastwood's films back when they were playing in
the theaters. This seems like a blatant attempt by Mr. Lee to create
some buzz about his movie.

Good article Jarrett.

Jarrett Martineau

Thanks for the flag -- and apologies about the formatting issues in the post, our story editing functionality seems to be broken. Will make it look pretty as soon as I'm able to.

René

There was a Native American, Marine Private First Class Ira Hayes (Adam Beach) an Arizona Native American.

And there already are those who claim Jesus was black, as well as the Madonna.

dunkelberg

 To show how Hollywood has changed:

In this case, they got ethnicity right by about 50% (depending on which theory of Native American migration theory you subscribe to).  That's pretty good for Hollywood, but Tony Curtis?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ira_Hayes


dunkelberg

As someone who was close to a similar controversy recently, there is a point that the black troops role is not represented.

It is something of which people should be aware.  From many of the WWII movies, you would think the entire U.S. Army was made up of white guys from New York City, particularly Brooklyn, a few farm boys and one guy from Texas (who catches the bullet, sigh).

In this case, Mr. Eastwood is 100% spot on.  You can't put them where they weren't, even if they would been proud to be there.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

June 6, 2008 at 06:50 pm by Jarrett Martineau, 998 views, 6 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from