NP Rank:
Species Extinction Threat Underestimated Due To Math Glitch
It appears that models used to calculate future species extinction rates have not included pertinent data which, when factored in alters results by two orders of magnitude.
Extinction risks for natural populations of endangered species are likely being underestimated by as much as 100-fold because of a mathematical "misdiagnosis," according to a new study led by a University of Colorado at Boulder researcher.
Assistant Professor Brett Melbourne of CU-Boulder's ecology and evolutionary biology department said current mathematical models used to determine extinction threat, or "red-listed" status, of species worldwide overlook random differences between individuals in a given population. Such differences, which include variations in male-to-female sex ratios as well as size or behavioral variations between individuals that can influence their survival rates and reproductive success, have an unexpectedly large effect on extinction risk calculations, according to the study.
"When we apply our new mathematical model to species extinction rates, it shows that things are worse than we thought," said Melbourne. "By accounting for random differences between individuals, extinction rates for endangered species can be orders of magnitude higher than conservation biologists have believed."
News Tools
July 5, 2008 at 01:39 pm by moonwolf, 184 views, 3 comments






Add a comment
Comments (3)
at 14:23 on July 5th, 2008
moonwolf, I like this story. It's good stuff. Great science/nature article! We don't get a lot of these on our site.
I was a little surprised by the 100 fold difference but looking at the list of overlooked factors, this seems believable.
at 15:38 on July 5th, 2008
Thanks rpshen! As often happens with scientific models the greater detail and amount of clean information included the more accurate the output.
at 14:10 on July 7th, 2008
Thanks.