Friends With Benefits, or the Benefits of a Friend?

by meyers | August 1, 2007 at 01:49 am | 2581 views | 1 comment

Though one should never underestimate the importance of a good wing-woman, it isn't entirely clear to me why you can't have your cake and eat it too...  I guess that is what makes me a man?  Benefits are  benefits,  lets  not worry about the semantics.

You'd like a friend with benefits. But have you considered the benefits of a friend? This woman says you should.

That's right. Men should be friends with women even without the benefits. We need to expand the notion of what those benefits are. After all, inside information from your female friend can be put to good use. And that's hardly the only perk of remaining platonic...

Add a comment Comments (1)

Barry Artiste

Hey Benefits work both ways, as long as both are satisfied then, as long as both enjoy vanilla fine, as long as both confine benefits to just each other.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

August 1, 2007 at 01:49 am by meyers, 2581 views, 1 comment

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from