NP Rank:
Afghanistan: Australian Trooper
508 views | 7 Recommendations | 2 comments
When you read Tony Clifton credentials you'll see he is well qualified to give his Australian perspective on the futility of the Australian involvement in this Afghan conflict.
About the Author
Tony Clifton worked for Newsweek for 30 years and covered the wars in Biafra and Vietnam, the Lebanon civil war, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the 1971 Bangladesh War and subsequent India-Pakistan conflicts, the Iran-Iraq war from both sides, the Tiananmen Square Massacre and the first Gulf War.
Image on right: Brendan Nelson with Australian troops in Afghanistan.
By: Tony CliftonThursday 11 October 2007
A few weeks ago, I wrote a column for NewMatilda.com asking the question, ‘What are we doing in Afghanistan?’
If we had two political Parties in this country with opposing views on policy, whether in foreign affairs or Tasmanian pulp mills, the death of the unfortunate Australian soldier Trooper David Pearce, killed on Monday by a roadside bomb in Oruzgan Province in southern Afghanistan, might have been the point where the Government was asked by the Opposition just how it justified keeping our small, pointless contingent in such a dangerous place.
But of course, Kevin Rudd, as with many other issues, marches in lockstep with John Howard on Afghanistan.
Like the man he so often follows, Rudd wants our troops to stay in Afghanistan. So when Howard says, as he did on Tuesday, ‘The operation in Afghanistan … is a just cause and this soldier was part of an Australian contribution to that just cause,’ Rudd came out and told us the same thing: ‘We will always be attentive and responsive to requests made by our friends and allies in Afghanistan in terms of future needs.’ Unlike most Opposition leaders, Rudd didn’t ask why the Government is sending our soldiers to die. And he certainly didn’t ask our leader to define ‘just cause.’
Somewhere in the waffling about our role in Afghanistan there is always a reference to it being part of the ‘War on Terrorism.’ This is plain nonsense. To repeat myself from last month, terrorism has long abandoned Afghanistan as either a haven or training ground. Osama bin Laden and his inner circle are somewhere in the tribal border areas of Pakistan, while al-Qaeda in Iraq recruits locally and from other parts of the Islamic world, and has a successful on-the-ground training facility in … well in the streets of Baghdad mainly.
The most ambitious terrorists are probably now doing engineering and electronics degrees in the universities and technological colleges of Europe and America, and the Islamic terrorists plotting away in Indonesia would recognise Osama mostly because they buy T-shirts with his face on them in the local tourist shops.
The war in Afghanistan is now a war on the local inhabitants, who would stop killing Americans, Canadians, Brits and now Australians, if only we would go away. The Taliban, who are local inhabitants, are fighting to throw out the foreign invaders. Funny people, the Afghans, they just don’t like foreigners — especially foreigners from non-Muslim countries — invading their country. In fact, under one Afghan leader or another’s banner, they’ve thrown out every foreign....
October 12, 2007 at 01:47 am by Tom van B, 508 views, 2 comments



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 04:49 on October 12th, 2007
Interesting commentary, Tom -- thanks.
at 10:28 on October 12th, 2007
Tom van B, thanks for posting this. What frightens me is the fact that we rarely hear about Afghanistan anymore in Canada. That is, unless someone is killed. What's happening over there? We're all up in arms over Iraq and the Bush administration being directionless, but we know even less about our own countrymen in Afghanistan. It's frightening to think about, because the thought of Stephen Harper making a decision about it is almost worse than not knowing anything.