NP Rank:
Penneys (Primark) drops firms using child labour
What is the right thing to do?
If I decide to boycott products produced by child labour and then as a result they become unemployed what happens to them and their family?
I ask this question because I do not know the answer and that worries me.
Penneys drops firms using child labour Sunday, 22 June 2008 19:24Trócaire has said that consumers should ask retailers tough questions about how in inexpensive clothes are sourced.
The charity was commenting on a report that three factories in India which supply clothing retailer Penney's were using child labour.
The BBC Panorama documentary found that t-shirts sold in the Penney's chain of stores were finished by child workers paid just 76 cent a day.
Primark, which trades as Penny's in Ireland, says that it investigated the allegations immediately, and that the three factories concerned had subcontracted out the work without its knowledge.
The company says that it will no longer buy goods from the factories concerned.
Primark has built up a business valued €6.3 billion based on fashionable clothes low prices.
Primark Stores Limited is an Irish clothing retailer, operating in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Spain. It has 161 stores with 125 in the UK, 34 in the Republic of Ireland and 4 in Spain. In the Republic of Ireland, where the company's main headquarters are based, it trades as Penneys. The company is a subsidiary of Associated British Foods (ABF) plc, employing over 26,000 people. The company positions itself as marketing fashionable clothing at competitive prices. There has been criticism of Primark concerning its supply chain, namely sweat shops in India and Bangladesh where employees work under harsh conditions for minimal pay. There was going to be a programme, exposing the manufacturing of the clothing for Primark on Channel 4 on Sunday June 1st 2008, however, at the last minute and for currently unknown reasons the programme was withdrawn from schedules.
UK clothing firm Primark has fired three Indian suppliers because they used child labour to finish goods.
The suppliers sub-contracted smaller firms, which were using child labour to carry out embroidery and sequin work.
The BBC's Panorama programme, which carried out a six-month investigation, alerted Primark to the problems.
Consumers are increasingly demanding that companies produce goods in an ethical manner, turning the spotlight on worker wages and working conditions.
'Lapse in standards'
"The information provided by the BBC enabled us to identify that illegal sub-contracting had been taking place and to take action accordingly," Primark explained.
According to Primark, the garments affected accounted for 0.04% of the retailers' worldwide sourcing.
It added that "the sub-contracting involved home working and in some instances children were also found to be working at home".
"We take this lapse in standards very seriously indeed," said Primark, which is owned by Associated British Foods.
"Under no circumstances would Primark ever knowingly permit such activities, whether directly through its suppliers or through third party sub-contractors."
News Tools
June 22, 2008 at 02:47 pm by infomatique, 444 views, 5 comments




Add a comment
Comments (5)
at 16:44 on June 22nd, 2008
Great find, and great commentary.
at 01:12 on June 23rd, 2008
infomatique, I like this story. It's good stuff.
and now those kids will become criminals.
till the time developing world and all concern adress the poverty issues this will go on.
Child labour is bad.
has BBC done a story on the after affects of this story.
at 06:48 on June 23rd, 2008
As far as I know the BBC has yet to broadcast the programme (this week I believe). Your idea of a follow up to see what happens to the children is an excellent idea.
at 07:51 on June 25th, 2008
infomatique, I like this story. It's good stuff.
We also covered this story being in the UK and the dilemma it presents on both sides of the situation:
http://www.desiblitz.com/content/primark-slammed-for-child-workers
I agree this is a hot issue as it does present problems for the children who earn a living to support their families.
at 08:02 on June 25th, 2008
nobody is suggesting alternative for those poor kids