NP Rank:
When Watchdogs Snore: How ABC, CBS and NBC Ignored Fannie & Freddie
Our 'Fourth Estate' was Asleep at the Wheel!
As of this Tuesday morning, the media has finally woke up. On Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough's MSNBC news program, reporters finally realize their role in providing the information the public needs to know.
By Rich Noyes
September 25, 2008 - 17:05 ETThe two mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae — seized by the government September 7 before they went completely bankrupt, at a potential cost to taxpayers of more than $25 billion — have been in obvious trouble for much of the past five years — with criminal investigations, accounting scandals, firings, resignations, huge losses and warnings from the Federal Reserve that their huge portfolio of mortgage securities posed a risk to the overall financial system.
But prior to this year, the watchdogs at ABC, CBS and NBC found time for only 10 stories on the financial health and management of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A review of the three networks’ morning and evening news programs from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007 found nine anchor-read items or brief references to the companies troubles, plus one in-depth report by CBS’s Anthony Mason on the May 23, 2006 Evening News, after Fannie Mae was fined $400 million for accounting fraud.
It’s not that the networks eschew business news. A 2005 report from the MRC’s Business and Media Institute found heavy coverage of the scandal surrounding Enron, but no interest in the growing scandal surrounding Fannie Mae: “A LexisNexis search of ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN on the term ‘Enron’ from the nine months around when the story first broke – Oct. 1, 2001, to July 1, 2002, produced 3,017 hits....A similar LexisNexis search was performed for the term ‘Fannie Mae’ for those same media, from June 1, 2004, to March 1, 2005, again during the time the story was breaking. This search discovered a paltry 37 matches.”
Follow the breakdown of media reaction to each new turn of the growing scandal. on NewsBusters
So: What's your take? Were the media negligent? Were they bought off? Or are they just morons too?
September 26, 2008 at 02:14 pm by René, 141 views, 6 comments





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 21:27 on September 26th, 2008
René, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 22:57 on September 26th, 2008
René, I like this story. It's good stuff. Weighing which is the heavier "negligence" or "moron"... it's a toss-up! Personally, am leaning toward the latter... but in order to prosecute em' it must be the former, as you can't prosecute someone for being a moron. With that said, however, it may be a good start at changing the law... because a court can find someone "criminally insane," would it be possible to find someone "criminally moronic?" :)
at 05:57 on September 27th, 2008
Try 'criminal negligence', but the public rules and judges with their TV remote. Ratings go down when the public loses confidence in their reliability and switches. What's more indicting than that most young people and others get their news from the Comedy Channel's Daily Show, or even the potty-mouthed Bill Maher on HBO's Real Time.
at 08:06 on September 27th, 2008
René, I like this story. It's good stuff. Oh but now they new it was going under LOL
at 08:50 on September 27th, 2008
rene
I like the storey .
why fed is doing descrepency they supporting some institution and ignoring other .
inspite of knoing evey body is equaly responsible for falure...
at 04:35 on September 30th, 2008
Biggest problem is lack of public oversight. The media dropped the ball on inflation and the Fed's role in it back in 1978, when the Iranian hostage crisis started, and they've never picked it back up. Now, when it's too late, some are starting to actually inform the public. but undoubtedly the internet has actually forced them to.